Ministral 3 3B 2512 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Ministral 3 3B 2512

Mistral AI
$0.10 / $0.10
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.23 / $2.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
Q
Verdict: Ministral 3 3B 2512 is 7.5× cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (12.7 vs 4.8).
Ministral 3 3B 2512Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.23
Output price / 1M$0.10$2.30
Blended price (3:1)$0.10$0.75
Cached input / 1M$0.01
Context window131K131K
Max output105K118K
Intelligence index4.812.7
Coding index4.822.1
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-12-022025-07-25
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ministral 3 3B 2512 or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Ministral 3 3B 2512 is 7.5× cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ministral 3 3B 2512 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: which has a bigger context window?

Ministral 3 3B 2512: 131,072 tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ministral 3 3B 2512 ≈ $250.00, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 ≈ $1,610.

More comparisons