Ministral 3 3B 2512 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Ministral 3 3B 2512

Mistral AI
$0.10 / $0.10
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

NVIDIA
$0.08 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
N
Verdict: Ministral 3 3B 2512 is 9% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (12.9 vs 4.8). Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Ministral 3 3B 2512Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.08
Output price / 1M$0.10$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.10$0.11
Cached input / 1M$0.01$0.04
Context window131K262K
Max output105K131K
Intelligence index4.812.9
Coding index4.826.8
Providers4
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-12-022026-08-11
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ministral 3 3B 2512 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Ministral 3 3B 2512 is 9% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ministral 3 3B 2512 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: which has a bigger context window?

Ministral 3 3B 2512: 131,072 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ministral 3 3B 2512 ≈ $250.00, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning ≈ $260.00.

More comparisons