Ministral 3 14B 2512 vs Qwen3.8 27B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Ministral 3 14B 2512

Mistral AI
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.42 / $3.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
Q
Verdict: Ministral 3 14B 2512 is 5.3× cheaper than Qwen3.8 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 27B scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (33.7 vs 6). Qwen3.8 27B has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Ministral 3 14B 2512Qwen3.8 27B
Input price / 1M$0.20$0.42
Output price / 1M$0.20$3.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$1.06
Cached input / 1M$0.02$0.085
Context window262K1M
Max output210K131K
Intelligence index633.7
Coding index14.468.1
Providers316
Best provider uptime (30m)99.7%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-12-022026-08-14
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ministral 3 14B 2512 or Qwen3.8 27B?

Ministral 3 14B 2512 is 5.3× cheaper than Qwen3.8 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ministral 3 14B 2512 vs Qwen3.8 27B: which has a bigger context window?

Ministral 3 14B 2512: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ministral 3 14B 2512 ≈ $500.00, Qwen3.8 27B ≈ $2,340.

More comparisons