Ministral 3 14B 2512 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Ministral 3 14B 2512

Mistral AI
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.40 / $4.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
Q
Verdict: Ministral 3 14B 2512 is 6.5× cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ministral 3 14B 2512 has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Ministral 3 14B 2512Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Input price / 1M$0.20$0.40
Output price / 1M$0.20$4.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$1.30
Cached input / 1M$0.02
Context window262K131K
Max output210K33K
Intelligence index6
Coding index14.4
Providers3
Best provider uptime (30m)99.3%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-12-022025-09-23
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ministral 3 14B 2512 or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Ministral 3 14B 2512 is 6.5× cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ministral 3 14B 2512 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: which has a bigger context window?

Ministral 3 14B 2512: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ministral 3 14B 2512 ≈ $500.00, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking ≈ $2,800.

More comparisons