MiniMax M3 vs Qwen3.6 27B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: MiniMax M3 is 43% cheaper than Qwen3.6 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (29.2 vs 21.4). MiniMax M3 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
| MiniMax M3 | Qwen3.6 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.30 | $0.32 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.20 | $2.70 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.52 | $0.92 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.06 | $0.15 |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Max output | 512K | 262K |
| Intelligence index | 29.2 | 21.4 |
| Coding index | 58.6 | 53.7 |
| Providers | 13 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-05-31 | 2026-04-27 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3 or Qwen3.6 27B?
MiniMax M3 is 43% cheaper than Qwen3.6 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
MiniMax M3 vs Qwen3.6 27B: which has a bigger context window?
MiniMax M3: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.6 27B: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M3 ≈ $1,200, Qwen3.6 27B ≈ $1,990.
More comparisons
MiniMax M3 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiniMax M3 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiniMax M3 vs Command A+MiniMax M3 vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiniMax M3 vs GPT-6 LunaMiniMax M3 vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiniMax M3 vs GPT-6 SolMiniMax M3 vs Claude Opus 5.5MiniMax M3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedMiniMax M3 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashMiniMax M3 vs Grok 4.7MiniMax M3 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashMiniMax M3 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXMiniMax M3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashMiniMax M3 vs GPT-6 AstraMiniMax M3 vs GPT-6 Astra ProQwen3.6 27B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.6 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.6 27B vs Command A+Qwen3.6 27B vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.6 27B vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.6 27B vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.6 27B vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.6 27B vs Claude Opus 5.5