MiniMax M2.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

MiniMax M2.7

MiniMax
$0.30 / $1.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen (Alibaba)
$2.00 / $6.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
Q
Verdict: MiniMax M2.7 is 5.7× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (45.4 vs 22.8). Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has the larger context window (1M vs 205K).
MiniMax M2.7Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input price / 1M$0.30$2.00
Output price / 1M$1.20$6.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.52$3.00
Cached input / 1M$0.06$0.25
Context window205K1M
Max output131K131K
Intelligence index22.845.4
Coding index52.676.2
Providers91
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-03-182026-09-03
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M2.7 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

MiniMax M2.7 is 5.7× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiniMax M2.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which has a bigger context window?

MiniMax M2.7: 204,800 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M2.7 ≈ $1,200, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ≈ $7,000.

More comparisons