MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

X

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Xiaomi
$0.43 / $0.87
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen (Alibaba)
$2.00 / $6.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
X
Q
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 5.5× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (46.3 vs 45.4). MiMo-V2.6-Pro has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
MiMo-V2.6-ProQwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input price / 1M$0.43$2.00
Output price / 1M$0.87$6.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.54$3.00
Cached input / 1M$0.0036$0.25
Context window1M1M
Max output131K131K
Intelligence index46.345.4
Coding index76.2
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-212026-09-03
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 5.5× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Pro ≈ $1,305, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ≈ $7,000.

More comparisons