MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed

Xiaomi

$4.35 / $8.70

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Qwen3 Coder Next

Qwen (Alibaba)

$0.12 / $0.80

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: Qwen3 Coder Next is 18.7× cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).

	MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed	Qwen3 Coder Next
Input price / 1M	$4.35	$0.12
Output price / 1M	$8.70	$0.80
Blended price (3:1)	$5.44	$0.29
Cached input / 1M	$0.036	$0.07
Context window	1M	262K
Max output	131K	236K
Intelligence index	—	9.2
Coding index	—	36.2
Providers	1	—
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	—
Vision input	Yes	No
Reasoning	Yes	No
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-09-21	2026-02-04
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is 18.7× cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Qwen3 Coder Next: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 Coder Next: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed ≈ $13,050, Qwen3 Coder Next ≈ $640.00.

More comparisons