MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Qwen3 Coder Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed

Xiaomi

$4.35 / $8.70

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Qwen3 Coder Flash

Qwen (Alibaba)

$0.20 / $0.97

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: Qwen3 Coder Flash is 13.9× cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).

	MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed	Qwen3 Coder Flash
Input price / 1M	$4.35	$0.20
Output price / 1M	$8.70	$0.97
Blended price (3:1)	$5.44	$0.39
Cached input / 1M	$0.036	$0.039
Context window	1M	1M
Max output	131K	66K
Intelligence index	—	—
Coding index	—	—
Providers	1	—
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	—
Vision input	Yes	No
Reasoning	Yes	No
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-09-21	2025-09-17
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed or Qwen3 Coder Flash?

Qwen3 Coder Flash is 13.9× cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Qwen3 Coder Flash: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 Coder Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed ≈ $13,050, Qwen3 Coder Flash ≈ $877.50.

More comparisons