GPT-6 Luna Pro vs Qwen3 Coder Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

GPT-6 Luna Pro

OpenAI

$0.10 / $0.50

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Qwen3 Coder Flash

Qwen (Alibaba)

$0.20 / $0.97

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: GPT-6 Luna Pro is 1.9× cheaper than Qwen3 Coder Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-6 Luna Pro has the larger context window (1.1M vs 1M).

	GPT-6 Luna Pro	Qwen3 Coder Flash
Input price / 1M	$0.10	$0.20
Output price / 1M	$0.50	$0.97
Blended price (3:1)	$0.20	$0.39
Cached input / 1M	$0.01	$0.039
Context window	1.1M	1M
Max output	128K	66K
Intelligence index	—	—
Coding index	—	—
Providers	6	—
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	—
Vision input	Yes	No
Reasoning	Yes	No
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-09-22	2025-09-17
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Luna Pro or Qwen3 Coder Flash?

GPT-6 Luna Pro is 1.9× cheaper than Qwen3 Coder Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GPT-6 Luna Pro vs Qwen3 Coder Flash: which has a bigger context window?

GPT-6 Luna Pro: 1,050,000 tokens. Qwen3 Coder Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-6 Luna Pro ≈ $450.00, Qwen3 Coder Flash ≈ $877.50.

GPT-6 Luna Pro vs Qwen3 Coder Flash

GPT-6 Luna Pro

Qwen3 Coder Flash

Cost calculator

FAQ

More comparisons