Mercury 2.5 vs Ministral 3 8B 2512
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Mercury 2.5 is 2.2× cheaper than Ministral 3 8B 2512 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ministral 3 8B 2512 has the larger context window (262K vs 260K).
| Mercury 2.5 | Ministral 3 8B 2512 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.04 | $0.15 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.15 | $0.15 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.0675 | $0.15 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.004 | $0.015 |
| Context window | 260K | 262K |
| Max output | 66K | 210K |
| Intelligence index | — | 5.5 |
| Coding index | — | 9.7 |
| Providers | — | 3 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 98.8% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-08 | 2025-12-02 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Mercury 2.5 or Ministral 3 8B 2512?
Mercury 2.5 is 2.2× cheaper than Ministral 3 8B 2512 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Mercury 2.5 vs Ministral 3 8B 2512: which has a bigger context window?
Mercury 2.5: 260,000 tokens. Ministral 3 8B 2512: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Mercury 2.5 ≈ $155.00, Ministral 3 8B 2512 ≈ $375.00.
More comparisons
Mercury 2.5 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMercury 2.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMercury 2.5 vs Command A+Mercury 2.5 vs GPT-6 Luna ProMercury 2.5 vs GPT-6 LunaMercury 2.5 vs GPT-6 Sol ProMercury 2.5 vs GPT-6 SolMercury 2.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5Mercury 2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedMercury 2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashMercury 2.5 vs Grok 4.7Mercury 2.5 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashMercury 2.5 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXMercury 2.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashMercury 2.5 vs GPT-6 AstraMercury 2.5 vs GPT-6 Astra ProMinistral 3 8B 2512 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMinistral 3 8B 2512 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMinistral 3 8B 2512 vs Command A+Ministral 3 8B 2512 vs GPT-6 Luna ProMinistral 3 8B 2512 vs GPT-6 LunaMinistral 3 8B 2512 vs GPT-6 Sol ProMinistral 3 8B 2512 vs GPT-6 SolMinistral 3 8B 2512 vs Claude Opus 5.5