Mercury 2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

I

Mercury 2.5

Inception
$0.04 / $0.15
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
X

MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed

Xiaomi
$4.35 / $8.70
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
I
X
Verdict: Mercury 2.5 is 80.6× cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed has the larger context window (1M vs 260K).
Mercury 2.5MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed
Input price / 1M$0.04$4.35
Output price / 1M$0.15$8.70
Blended price (3:1)$0.0675$5.44
Cached input / 1M$0.004$0.036
Context window260K1M
Max output66K131K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-082026-09-21
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Mercury 2.5 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed?

Mercury 2.5 is 80.6× cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Mercury 2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed: which has a bigger context window?

Mercury 2.5: 260,000 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Mercury 2.5 ≈ $155.00, MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed ≈ $13,050.

More comparisons