Llama Guard 4 12B vs Phi 4
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Phi 4 is 2.1× cheaper than Llama Guard 4 12B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama Guard 4 12B has the larger context window (164K vs 16K).
| Llama Guard 4 12B | Phi 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.18 | $0.07 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.18 | $0.14 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.18 | $0.0875 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — |
| Context window | 164K | 16K |
| Max output | 16K | 15K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | No | No |
| Released | 2025-04-30 | 2025-01-10 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Llama Guard 4 12B or Phi 4?
Phi 4 is 2.1× cheaper than Llama Guard 4 12B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Llama Guard 4 12B vs Phi 4: which has a bigger context window?
Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens. Phi 4: 16,384 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00, Phi 4 ≈ $210.00.
More comparisons
Llama Guard 4 12B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Command A+Llama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 LunaLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 SolLlama Guard 4 12B vs Claude Opus 5.5Llama Guard 4 12B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedLlama Guard 4 12B vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashLlama Guard 4 12B vs Grok 4.7Llama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLlama Guard 4 12B vs GLM 5.3 FlashXLlama Guard 4 12B vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 AstraLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Astra ProPhi 4 vs GLM 5.3 PrimePhi 4 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimePhi 4 vs Command A+Phi 4 vs GPT-6 Luna ProPhi 4 vs GPT-6 LunaPhi 4 vs GPT-6 Sol ProPhi 4 vs GPT-6 SolPhi 4 vs Claude Opus 5.5