Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3.8 27B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 7.1× cheaper than Qwen3.8 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 1M).
| Llama 4 Scout | Qwen3.8 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.10 | $0.42 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.30 | $3.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.15 | $1.06 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.085 |
| Context window | 1.3M | 1M |
| Max output | 16K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | 33.7 |
| Coding index | 8.2 | 68.1 |
| Providers | 3 | 16 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 99.9% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-04-05 | 2026-08-14 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or Qwen3.8 27B?
Llama 4 Scout is 7.1× cheaper than Qwen3.8 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3.8 27B: which has a bigger context window?
Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens. Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00, Qwen3.8 27B ≈ $2,340.
More comparisons
Llama 4 Scout vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama 4 Scout vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama 4 Scout vs Command A+Llama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 LunaLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 SolLlama 4 Scout vs Claude Opus 5.5Llama 4 Scout vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedLlama 4 Scout vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashLlama 4 Scout vs Grok 4.7Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLlama 4 Scout vs GLM 5.3 FlashXLlama 4 Scout vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 AstraLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 Astra ProQwen3.8 27B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 27B vs Command A+Qwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 27B vs Claude Opus 5.5