Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3.8 Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Qwen3.8 Flash is 24% cheaper than Llama 4 Maverick on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Maverick has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
| Llama 4 Maverick | Qwen3.8 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.19 | $0.15 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.65 | $0.47 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.30 | $0.23 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.016 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 16K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | 16.3 | — |
| Providers | 5 | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-04-05 | 2026-08-26 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Qwen3.8 Flash is 24% cheaper than Llama 4 Maverick on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3.8 Flash: which has a bigger context window?
Llama 4 Maverick: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.8 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama 4 Maverick ≈ $701.25, Qwen3.8 Flash ≈ $535.00.
More comparisons
Llama 4 Maverick vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama 4 Maverick vs Command A+Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama 4 Maverick vs GPT-6 LunaLlama 4 Maverick vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama 4 Maverick vs GPT-6 SolLlama 4 Maverick vs Claude Opus 5.5Llama 4 Maverick vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedLlama 4 Maverick vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashLlama 4 Maverick vs Grok 4.7Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLlama 4 Maverick vs GLM 5.3 FlashXLlama 4 Maverick vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLlama 4 Maverick vs GPT-6 AstraLlama 4 Maverick vs GPT-6 Astra ProQwen3.8 Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 Flash vs Command A+Qwen3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5