Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3.8 27B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Llama 4 Maverick

Meta Llama
$0.19 / $0.65
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.42 / $3.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
Q
Verdict: Llama 4 Maverick is 3.5× cheaper than Qwen3.8 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Maverick has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Llama 4 MaverickQwen3.8 27B
Input price / 1M$0.19$0.42
Output price / 1M$0.65$3.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.30$1.06
Cached input / 1M$0.085
Context window1M1M
Max output16K131K
Intelligence index33.7
Coding index16.368.1
Providers516
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-04-052026-08-14
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3.8 27B?

Llama 4 Maverick is 3.5× cheaper than Qwen3.8 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3.8 27B: which has a bigger context window?

Llama 4 Maverick: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama 4 Maverick ≈ $701.25, Qwen3.8 27B ≈ $2,340.

More comparisons