Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Meta Llama
$0.40 / $0.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

NVIDIA
$0.08 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
N
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 3.6× cheaper than Llama 3.1 70B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Llama 3.1 70B InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning
Input price / 1M$0.40$0.08
Output price / 1M$0.40$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.40$0.11
Cached input / 1M$0.04
Context window131K262K
Max output16K131K
Intelligence index12.9
Coding index26.8
Providers4
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2024-07-232026-08-11
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 3.6× cheaper than Llama 3.1 70B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: which has a bigger context window?

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct: 131,072 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama 3.1 70B Instruct ≈ $1,000, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning ≈ $260.00.

More comparisons