Hy4 vs LFM3-1.7B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Tencent

Hy4

Tencent
$0.42 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Liquid

LFM3-1.7B

Liquid
$0.08 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Tencent
Liquid
Verdict: LFM3-1.7B is 5.7× cheaper than Hy4 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Hy4 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Hy4LFM3-1.7B
Input price / 1M$0.42$0.08
Output price / 1M$1.25$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.63$0.11
Cached input / 1M$0.021$0.02
Context window1M262K
Max output66K8K
Intelligence index34.6—
Coding index——
Providers1—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-042026-11-06
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Hy4 or LFM3-1.7B?

LFM3-1.7B is 5.7× cheaper than Hy4 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Hy4 vs LFM3-1.7B: which has a bigger context window?

Hy4: 1,048,576 tokens. LFM3-1.7B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Hy4 ≈ $1,459, LFM3-1.7B ≈ $260.00.

More comparisons