Grok 4.20 vs Llama Guard 4 12B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama Guard 4 12B is 8.7× cheaper than Grok 4.20 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Grok 4.20 has the larger context window (2M vs 164K).
| Grok 4.20 | Llama Guard 4 12B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.25 | $0.18 |
| Output price / 1M | $2.50 | $0.18 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.56 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.20 | — |
| Context window | 2M | 164K |
| Max output | 1.8M | 16K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2026-03-31 | 2025-04-30 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 or Llama Guard 4 12B?
Llama Guard 4 12B is 8.7× cheaper than Grok 4.20 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Grok 4.20 vs Llama Guard 4 12B: which has a bigger context window?
Grok 4.20: 2,000,000 tokens. Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Grok 4.20 ≈ $3,750, Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00.
More comparisons
Grok 4.20 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGrok 4.20 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGrok 4.20 vs Command A+Grok 4.20 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGrok 4.20 vs GPT-6 LunaGrok 4.20 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGrok 4.20 vs GPT-6 SolGrok 4.20 vs Claude Opus 5.5Grok 4.20 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGrok 4.20 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGrok 4.20 vs Grok 4.7Grok 4.20 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGrok 4.20 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGrok 4.20 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGrok 4.20 vs GPT-6 AstraGrok 4.20 vs GPT-6 Astra ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Command A+Llama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 LunaLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 SolLlama Guard 4 12B vs Claude Opus 5.5