gpt-oss-120b vs Ling 3.0 Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash is 8.3× cheaper than gpt-oss-120b on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
| gpt-oss-120b | Ling 3.0 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.15 | $0.021 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.60 | $0.063 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.26 | $0.0315 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.075 | $0.0042 |
| Context window | 131K | 262K |
| Max output | 66K | 33K |
| Intelligence index | 3.8 | — |
| Coding index | 30.4 | 50.6 |
| Providers | — | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-08-05 | 2026-07-23 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, gpt-oss-120b or Ling 3.0 Flash?
Ling 3.0 Flash is 8.3× cheaper than gpt-oss-120b on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
gpt-oss-120b vs Ling 3.0 Flash: which has a bigger context window?
gpt-oss-120b: 131,072 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: gpt-oss-120b ≈ $600.00, Ling 3.0 Flash ≈ $73.50.
More comparisons
gpt-oss-120b vs Gemini 4 Carbongpt-oss-120b vs Claude Fable 5.2gpt-oss-120b vs Gemini Omni 1.2 Flashgpt-oss-120b vs Gemini Omni 1.1 Flashgpt-oss-120b vs Hy4gpt-oss-120b vs GLM 5.3 FlashX Legalgpt-oss-120b vs GPT-6.1 Terragpt-oss-120b vs GPT-6.1 Terra Progpt-oss-120b vs Kimi K3.1 Progpt-oss-120b vs MiniMax M3.1 Flashgpt-oss-120b vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLgpt-oss-120b vs Gemini 4 Argongpt-oss-120b vs Claude Haiku 5.5gpt-oss-120b vs Nano Banana 2.1gpt-oss-120b vs Mistral Large 4Ling 3.0 Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonLing 3.0 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2Ling 3.0 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashLing 3.0 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashLing 3.0 Flash vs Hy4Ling 3.0 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalLing 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraLing 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro