GPT-6.1 Terra vs Phi 4
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Phi 4 is 22.9× cheaper than GPT-6.1 Terra on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-6.1 Terra has the larger context window (1.1M vs 16K).
| GPT-6.1 Terra | Phi 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.00 | $0.07 |
| Output price / 1M | $5.00 | $0.14 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $2.00 | $0.0875 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.05 | — |
| Context window | 1.1M | 16K |
| Max output | 128K | 15K |
| Intelligence index | 51.3 | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 7 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2026-10-26 | 2025-01-10 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Terra or Phi 4?
Phi 4 is 22.9× cheaper than GPT-6.1 Terra on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-6.1 Terra vs Phi 4: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-6.1 Terra: 1,050,000 tokens. Phi 4: 16,384 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-6.1 Terra ≈ $4,500, Phi 4 ≈ $210.00.
More comparisons
GPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini 4 CarbonGPT-6.1 Terra vs Claude Fable 5.2GPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGPT-6.1 Terra vs Hy4GPT-6.1 Terra vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGPT-6.1 Terra vs Kimi K3.1 ProGPT-6.1 Terra vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGPT-6.1 Terra vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-6.1 Terra vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini 4 ArgonGPT-6.1 Terra vs Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-6.1 Terra vs Nano Banana 2.1GPT-6.1 Terra vs Mistral Large 4GPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProPhi 4 vs Gemini 4 CarbonPhi 4 vs Claude Fable 5.2Phi 4 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashPhi 4 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashPhi 4 vs Hy4Phi 4 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalPhi 4 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProPhi 4 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro