GPT-5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 64.3× cheaper than GPT-5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-5.5 has the larger context window (1.1M vs 1M).
| GPT-5.5 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $5.00 | $0.14 |
| Output price / 1M | $30.00 | $0.28 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $11.25 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.50 | $0.0028 |
| Context window | 1.1M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 38.4 | — |
| Coding index | 74.9 | — |
| Providers | — | 2 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 99.9% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-04-24 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.5 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 64.3× cheaper than GPT-5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-5.5: 1,050,000 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-5.5 ≈ $25,000, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.
More comparisons
GPT-5.5 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-5.5 vs Command A+GPT-5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT-5.5 vs GPT-6 LunaGPT-5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-5.5 vs GPT-6 SolGPT-5.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGPT-5.5 vs Grok 4.7GPT-5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGPT-5.5 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGPT-5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-5.5 vs GPT-6 AstraGPT-5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra ProGPT-5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5