GPT-5.2 vs Ministral 3 14B 2512
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Ministral 3 14B 2512 is 24.1× cheaper than GPT-5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-5.2 has the larger context window (400K vs 262K).
| GPT-5.2 | Ministral 3 14B 2512 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.75 | $0.20 |
| Output price / 1M | $14.00 | $0.20 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.81 | $0.20 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.17 | $0.02 |
| Context window | 400K | 262K |
| Max output | 128K | 210K |
| Intelligence index | — | 6 |
| Coding index | — | 14.4 |
| Providers | — | 3 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 99.3% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-12-10 | 2025-12-02 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 or Ministral 3 14B 2512?
Ministral 3 14B 2512 is 24.1× cheaper than GPT-5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-5.2 vs Ministral 3 14B 2512: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-5.2: 400,000 tokens. Ministral 3 14B 2512: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-5.2 ≈ $10,500, Ministral 3 14B 2512 ≈ $500.00.
More comparisons
GPT-5.2 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-5.2 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-5.2 vs Command A+GPT-5.2 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT-5.2 vs GPT-6 LunaGPT-5.2 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-5.2 vs GPT-6 SolGPT-5.2 vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-5.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGPT-5.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGPT-5.2 vs Grok 4.7GPT-5.2 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGPT-5.2 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGPT-5.2 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-5.2 vs GPT-6 AstraGPT-5.2 vs GPT-6 Astra ProMinistral 3 14B 2512 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMinistral 3 14B 2512 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMinistral 3 14B 2512 vs Command A+Ministral 3 14B 2512 vs GPT-6 Luna ProMinistral 3 14B 2512 vs GPT-6 LunaMinistral 3 14B 2512 vs GPT-6 Sol ProMinistral 3 14B 2512 vs GPT-6 SolMinistral 3 14B 2512 vs Claude Opus 5.5