GPT-5.2 Chat vs Llama Guard 4 12B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama Guard 4 12B is 26.7× cheaper than GPT-5.2 Chat on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama Guard 4 12B has the larger context window (164K vs 128K).
| GPT-5.2 Chat | Llama Guard 4 12B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.75 | $0.18 |
| Output price / 1M | $14.00 | $0.18 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.81 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.17 | — |
| Context window | 128K | 164K |
| Max output | 32K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2025-12-10 | 2025-04-30 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 Chat or Llama Guard 4 12B?
Llama Guard 4 12B is 26.7× cheaper than GPT-5.2 Chat on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-5.2 Chat vs Llama Guard 4 12B: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-5.2 Chat: 128,000 tokens. Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-5.2 Chat ≈ $10,500, Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00.
More comparisons
GPT-5.2 Chat vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-5.2 Chat vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-5.2 Chat vs Command A+GPT-5.2 Chat vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT-5.2 Chat vs GPT-6 LunaGPT-5.2 Chat vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-5.2 Chat vs GPT-6 SolGPT-5.2 Chat vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-5.2 Chat vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGPT-5.2 Chat vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGPT-5.2 Chat vs Grok 4.7GPT-5.2 Chat vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGPT-5.2 Chat vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGPT-5.2 Chat vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-5.2 Chat vs GPT-6 AstraGPT-5.2 Chat vs GPT-6 Astra ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Command A+Llama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 LunaLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 SolLlama Guard 4 12B vs Claude Opus 5.5