GPT-5.2 Chat vs Qwen3.8 Max Prime
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GPT-5.2 Chat is 20% cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Max Prime has the larger context window (1M vs 128K).
| GPT-5.2 Chat | Qwen3.8 Max Prime | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.75 | $4.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $14.00 | $12.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.81 | $6.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.17 | $0.50 |
| Context window | 128K | 1M |
| Max output | 32K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-12-10 | 2026-09-23 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 Chat or Qwen3.8 Max Prime?
GPT-5.2 Chat is 20% cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-5.2 Chat vs Qwen3.8 Max Prime: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-5.2 Chat: 128,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max Prime: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-5.2 Chat ≈ $10,500, Qwen3.8 Max Prime ≈ $14,000.
More comparisons
GPT-5.2 Chat vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-5.2 Chat vs Command A+GPT-5.2 Chat vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT-5.2 Chat vs GPT-6 LunaGPT-5.2 Chat vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-5.2 Chat vs GPT-6 SolGPT-5.2 Chat vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-5.2 Chat vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGPT-5.2 Chat vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGPT-5.2 Chat vs Grok 4.7GPT-5.2 Chat vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGPT-5.2 Chat vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGPT-5.2 Chat vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-5.2 Chat vs GPT-6 AstraGPT-5.2 Chat vs GPT-6 Astra ProGPT-5.2 Chat vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 Max Prime vs Command A+Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Max Prime vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 Max Prime vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 Max Prime vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 Max Prime vs Claude Opus 5.5Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed