GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Mistral Nemo
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Mistral Nemo is 25.6× cheaper than GPT-3.5 Turbo on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Mistral Nemo has the larger context window (131K vs 16K).
| GPT-3.5 Turbo | Mistral Nemo | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.50 | $0.029 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.50 | $0.03 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.75 | $0.0293 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — |
| Context window | 16K | 131K |
| Max output | 4K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | 5.5 | — |
| Coding index | 10.7 | — |
| Providers | — | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2023-05-28 | 2024-07-19 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-3.5 Turbo or Mistral Nemo?
Mistral Nemo is 25.6× cheaper than GPT-3.5 Turbo on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Mistral Nemo: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-3.5 Turbo: 16,385 tokens. Mistral Nemo: 131,072 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-3.5 Turbo ≈ $1,750, Mistral Nemo ≈ $73.00.
More comparisons
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Gemini 4 CarbonGPT-3.5 Turbo vs Claude Fable 5.2GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGPT-3.5 Turbo vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGPT-3.5 Turbo vs Hy4GPT-3.5 Turbo vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGPT-3.5 Turbo vs GPT-6.1 TerraGPT-3.5 Turbo vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGPT-3.5 Turbo vs Kimi K3.1 ProGPT-3.5 Turbo vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGPT-3.5 Turbo vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGPT-3.5 Turbo vs Gemini 4 ArgonGPT-3.5 Turbo vs Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Nano Banana 2.1GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Mistral Large 4Mistral Nemo vs Gemini 4 CarbonMistral Nemo vs Claude Fable 5.2Mistral Nemo vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashMistral Nemo vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashMistral Nemo vs Hy4Mistral Nemo vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalMistral Nemo vs GPT-6.1 TerraMistral Nemo vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro