GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Ling 3.0 Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash is 23.8× cheaper than GPT-3.5 Turbo on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash has the larger context window (262K vs 16K).
| GPT-3.5 Turbo | Ling 3.0 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.50 | $0.021 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.50 | $0.063 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.75 | $0.0315 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.0042 |
| Context window | 16K | 262K |
| Max output | 4K | 33K |
| Intelligence index | 5.5 | — |
| Coding index | 10.7 | 50.6 |
| Providers | — | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2023-05-28 | 2026-07-23 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-3.5 Turbo or Ling 3.0 Flash?
Ling 3.0 Flash is 23.8× cheaper than GPT-3.5 Turbo on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Ling 3.0 Flash: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-3.5 Turbo: 16,385 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-3.5 Turbo ≈ $1,750, Ling 3.0 Flash ≈ $73.50.
More comparisons
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Gemini 4 CarbonGPT-3.5 Turbo vs Claude Fable 5.2GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGPT-3.5 Turbo vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGPT-3.5 Turbo vs Hy4GPT-3.5 Turbo vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGPT-3.5 Turbo vs GPT-6.1 TerraGPT-3.5 Turbo vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGPT-3.5 Turbo vs Kimi K3.1 ProGPT-3.5 Turbo vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGPT-3.5 Turbo vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGPT-3.5 Turbo vs Gemini 4 ArgonGPT-3.5 Turbo vs Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Nano Banana 2.1GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Mistral Large 4Ling 3.0 Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonLing 3.0 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2Ling 3.0 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashLing 3.0 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashLing 3.0 Flash vs Hy4Ling 3.0 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalLing 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraLing 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro