GLM 4.7 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 4.7 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.0605 / $0.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen (Alibaba)
$2.00 / $6.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
Q
Verdict: GLM 4.7 Flash is 20.6× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has the larger context window (1M vs 200K).
GLM 4.7 FlashQwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input price / 1M$0.0605$2.00
Output price / 1M$0.40$6.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$3.00
Cached input / 1M$0.25
Context window200K1M
Max output118K131K
Intelligence index45.4
Coding index76.2
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-01-192026-09-03
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 4.7 Flash or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

GLM 4.7 Flash is 20.6× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which has a bigger context window?

GLM 4.7 Flash: 200,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 4.7 Flash ≈ $321.00, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ≈ $7,000.

More comparisons