GLM 4.7 Flash vs Grok 4.7

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 4.7 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.0605 / $0.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
X

Grok 4.7

xAI
$1.60 / $4.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
X
Verdict: GLM 4.7 Flash is 16.5× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Grok 4.7 has the larger context window (500K vs 200K).
GLM 4.7 FlashGrok 4.7
Input price / 1M$0.0605$1.60
Output price / 1M$0.40$4.80
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$2.40
Cached input / 1M—$0.40
Context window200K500K
Max output118K450K
Intelligence index—46.4
Coding index——
Providers—4
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-01-192026-09-21
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 4.7 Flash or Grok 4.7?

GLM 4.7 Flash is 16.5× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Grok 4.7: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 4.7 Flash: 200,000 tokens. Grok 4.7: 500,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 4.7 Flash ≈ $321.00, Grok 4.7 ≈ $5,600.

More comparisons

GLM 4.7 Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 4.7 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 4.7 Flash vs Command A+GLM 4.7 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 4.7 Flash vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 4.7 Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 4.7 Flash vs GPT-6 SolGLM 4.7 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5GLM 4.7 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGLM 4.7 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGLM 4.7 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGLM 4.7 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGLM 4.7 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 4.7 Flash vs GPT-6 AstraGLM 4.7 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra ProGLM 4.7 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Command A+Grok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 LunaGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 SolGrok 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5