GLM 4.5 Air vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 44% cheaper than GLM 4.5 Air on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
| GLM 4.5 Air | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.13 | $0.14 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.85 | $0.28 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.31 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.025 | $0.0028 |
| Context window | 131K | 1M |
| Max output | 98K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 2 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 99.9% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-07-25 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 4.5 Air or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 44% cheaper than GLM 4.5 Air on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 4.5 Air vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 4.5 Air: 131,072 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 4.5 Air ≈ $685.00, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.
More comparisons
GLM 4.5 Air vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 4.5 Air vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 4.5 Air vs Command A+GLM 4.5 Air vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 4.5 Air vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 4.5 Air vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 4.5 Air vs GPT-6 SolGLM 4.5 Air vs Claude Opus 5.5GLM 4.5 Air vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGLM 4.5 Air vs Grok 4.7GLM 4.5 Air vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGLM 4.5 Air vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGLM 4.5 Air vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 4.5 Air vs GPT-6 AstraGLM 4.5 Air vs GPT-6 Astra ProGLM 4.5 Air vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5