Gemini 4 Carbon vs Qwen3.5-Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Gemini 4 Carbon

Google
$2.00 / $10.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.5-Flash

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.065 / $0.26
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen3.5-Flash is 35.2× cheaper than Gemini 4 Carbon on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Gemini 4 Carbon has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Gemini 4 CarbonQwen3.5-Flash
Input price / 1M$2.00$0.065
Output price / 1M$10.00$0.26
Blended price (3:1)$4.00$0.11
Cached input / 1M$0.10—
Context window1M1M
Max output944K66K
Intelligence index60—
Coding index——
Providers7—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-102026-02-25
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Carbon or Qwen3.5-Flash?

Qwen3.5-Flash is 35.2× cheaper than Gemini 4 Carbon on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini 4 Carbon vs Qwen3.5-Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini 4 Carbon: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.5-Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini 4 Carbon ≈ $9,000, Qwen3.5-Flash ≈ $260.00.

More comparisons