Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GLM 5.3
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 is 14% cheaper than Gemini 3.7 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (44.8 vs 39.1). GLM 5.3 has the larger context window (1.3M vs 1M).
| Gemini 3.7 Flash | GLM 5.3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.75 | $0.84 |
| Output price / 1M | $3.75 | $2.64 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.50 | $1.29 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.075 | $0.16 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.3M |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 39.1 | 44.8 |
| Coding index | 76.1 | 74.8 |
| Providers | 6 | 34 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 99.9% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-13 | 2026-08-18 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or GLM 5.3?
GLM 5.3 is 14% cheaper than Gemini 3.7 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GLM 5.3: which has a bigger context window?
Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. GLM 5.3: 1,310,720 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini 3.7 Flash ≈ $3,375, GLM 5.3 ≈ $3,000.
More comparisons
Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGemini 3.7 Flash vs Command A+Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProGemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-6 LunaGemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProGemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-6 SolGemini 3.7 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5Gemini 3.7 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGemini 3.7 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGemini 3.7 Flash vs Grok 4.7Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGemini 3.7 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGemini 3.7 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-6 AstraGemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra ProGLM 5.3 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 vs Command A+GLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.3 vs Claude Opus 5.5