Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3.8 27B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

G

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Google
$0.30 / $2.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.42 / $3.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
G
Q
Verdict: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is 20% cheaper than Qwen3.8 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 27B scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (33.7 vs 22.2). Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen3.8 27B
Input price / 1M$0.30$0.42
Output price / 1M$2.50$3.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.85$1.06
Cached input / 1M$0.03$0.085
Context window1M1M
Max output66K131K
Intelligence index22.233.7
Coding index49.368.1
Providers816
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-07-212026-08-14
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Qwen3.8 27B?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is 20% cheaper than Qwen3.8 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3.8 27B: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite ≈ $1,850, Qwen3.8 27B ≈ $2,340.

More comparisons