Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

G

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Google
$0.30 / $2.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.15 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
G
Q
Verdict: Qwen3.6 35B A3B is 2.3× cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (22.2 vs 18.2). Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen3.6 35B A3B
Input price / 1M$0.30$0.15
Output price / 1M$2.50$1.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.85$0.36
Cached input / 1M$0.03$0.05
Context window1M262K
Max output66K236K
Intelligence index22.218.2
Coding index49.341.9
Providers8
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-07-212026-04-27
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

Qwen3.6 35B A3B is 2.3× cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.6 35B A3B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite ≈ $1,850, Qwen3.6 35B A3B ≈ $800.00.

More comparisons