Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Kimi K2.6

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Google

$0.30 / $2.50

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Kimi K2.6

Moonshot AI

$0.95 / $4.00

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is 2.0× cheaper than Kimi K2.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Kimi K2.6 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (27 vs 22.2). Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).

	Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite	Kimi K2.6
Input price / 1M	$0.30	$0.95
Output price / 1M	$2.50	$4.00
Blended price (3:1)	$0.85	$1.71
Cached input / 1M	$0.03	$0.16
Context window	1M	262K
Max output	66K	236K
Intelligence index	22.2	27
Coding index	49.3	61.8
Providers	8	22
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	100.0%
Vision input	Yes	Yes
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-07-21	2026-04-20
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Kimi K2.6?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is 2.0× cheaper than Kimi K2.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Kimi K2.6: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 1,048,576 tokens. Kimi K2.6: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite ≈ $1,850, Kimi K2.6 ≈ $3,900.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Kimi K2.6