Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

G

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)

Google
$0.25 / $1.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen (Alibaba)
$2.00 / $6.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
G
Q
Verdict: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) is 5.3× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has the larger context window (1M vs 66K).
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input price / 1M$0.25$2.00
Output price / 1M$1.50$6.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.56$3.00
Cached input / 1M$0.25
Context window66K1M
Max output59K131K
Intelligence index45.4
Coding index76.2
Providers21
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2026-06-302026-09-03
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) is 5.3× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image): 65,536 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) ≈ $1,250, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ≈ $7,000.

More comparisons