Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) vs Qwen3.8 27B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

G

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)

Google
$0.25 / $1.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.42 / $3.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
G
Q
Verdict: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) is 47% cheaper than Qwen3.8 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 27B has the larger context window (1M vs 66K).
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Qwen3.8 27B
Input price / 1M$0.25$0.42
Output price / 1M$1.50$3.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.56$1.06
Cached input / 1M$0.085
Context window66K1M
Max output59K131K
Intelligence index33.7
Coding index68.1
Providers216
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2026-06-302026-08-14
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) or Qwen3.8 27B?

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) is 47% cheaper than Qwen3.8 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) vs Qwen3.8 27B: which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image): 65,536 tokens. Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) ≈ $1,250, Qwen3.8 27B ≈ $2,340.

More comparisons