Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

G

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)

Google
$0.25 / $1.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral AI
$1.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
G
M
Verdict: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) is 5.3× cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Mistral Medium 3.5 has the larger context window (262K vs 66K).
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Mistral Medium 3.5
Input price / 1M$0.25$1.50
Output price / 1M$1.50$7.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.56$3.00
Cached input / 1M
Context window66K262K
Max output59K210K
Intelligence index14.2
Coding index46.9
Providers22
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2026-06-302026-04-30
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) or Mistral Medium 3.5?

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) is 5.3× cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) vs Mistral Medium 3.5: which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image): 65,536 tokens. Mistral Medium 3.5: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) ≈ $1,250, Mistral Medium 3.5 ≈ $6,750.

More comparisons