Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Kimi K2.6

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

G

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Google
$0.50 / $3.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Kimi K2.6

Moonshot AI
$0.95 / $4.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
G
M
Verdict: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is 34% cheaper than Kimi K2.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Kimi K2.6 has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Kimi K2.6
Input price / 1M$0.50$0.95
Output price / 1M$3.00$4.00
Blended price (3:1)$1.13$1.71
Cached input / 1M$0.16
Context window131K262K
Max output33K236K
Intelligence index27
Coding index61.8
Providers222
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2026-06-182026-04-20
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Kimi K2.6?

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is 34% cheaper than Kimi K2.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Kimi K2.6: which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): 131,072 tokens. Kimi K2.6: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) ≈ $2,500, Kimi K2.6 ≈ $3,900.

More comparisons