DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-27B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

D

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek
$0.14 / $0.42
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.5-27B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.20 / $1.56
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
D
Q
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 2.6× cheaper than Qwen3.5-27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashQwen3.5-27B
Input price / 1M$0.14$0.20
Output price / 1M$0.42$1.56
Blended price (3:1)$0.21$0.54
Cached input / 1M$0.0042
Context window1M262K
Max output131K66K
Intelligence index39.5
Coding index
Providers26
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-102026-02-25
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Qwen3.5-27B?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 2.6× cheaper than Qwen3.5-27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-27B: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.5-27B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ≈ $490.00, Qwen3.5-27B ≈ $1,170.

More comparisons