DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM 5.1

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek
$0.14 / $0.42
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.1

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.97 / $3.04
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 7.1× cheaper than GLM 5.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (39.5 vs 26.1). DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 205K).
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 5.1
Input price / 1M$0.14$0.97
Output price / 1M$0.42$3.04
Blended price (3:1)$0.21$1.48
Cached input / 1M$0.0042$0.18
Context window1M205K
Max output131K128K
Intelligence index39.526.1
Coding index55.8
Providers26
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-102026-04-07
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GLM 5.1?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 7.1× cheaper than GLM 5.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM 5.1: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. GLM 5.1: 204,800 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ≈ $490.00, GLM 5.1 ≈ $3,450.

More comparisons