DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Mercury 2.5

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

D

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

DeepSeek
$0.03 / $0.32
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
I

Mercury 2.5

Inception
$0.04 / $0.15
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
D
I
Verdict: Mercury 2.5 is 34% cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has the larger context window (1.3M vs 260K).
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Mercury 2.5
Input price / 1M$0.03$0.04
Output price / 1M$0.32$0.15
Blended price (3:1)$0.10$0.0675
Cached input / 1M$0.016$0.004
Context window1.3M260K
Max output944K66K
Intelligence index34.3
Coding index69.1
Providers30
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-07-312026-09-08
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Mercury 2.5?

Mercury 2.5 is 34% cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Mercury 2.5: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 1,310,720 tokens. Mercury 2.5: 260,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 ≈ $220.00, Mercury 2.5 ≈ $155.00.

More comparisons