DeepSeek V3.2 vs Llama Guard 4 12B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama Guard 4 12B is 40% cheaper than DeepSeek V3.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
| DeepSeek V3.2 | Llama Guard 4 12B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.27 | $0.18 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.40 | $0.18 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.30 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.13 | — |
| Context window | 164K | 164K |
| Max output | 66K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | 44.2 | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2025-12-01 | 2025-04-30 |
| Retirement | 2026-09-28 | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 or Llama Guard 4 12B?
Llama Guard 4 12B is 40% cheaper than DeepSeek V3.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
DeepSeek V3.2 vs Llama Guard 4 12B: which has a bigger context window?
DeepSeek V3.2: 163,840 tokens. Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V3.2 ≈ $738.00, Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00.
More comparisons
DeepSeek V3.2 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeDeepSeek V3.2 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeDeepSeek V3.2 vs Command A+DeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-6 Luna ProDeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-6 LunaDeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-6 Sol ProDeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-6 SolDeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Opus 5.5DeepSeek V3.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedDeepSeek V3.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashDeepSeek V3.2 vs Grok 4.7DeepSeek V3.2 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashDeepSeek V3.2 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXDeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-6 AstraDeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-6 Astra ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Command A+Llama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 LunaLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 SolLlama Guard 4 12B vs Claude Opus 5.5