DeepSeek V3.2 vs Grok 4.7
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: DeepSeek V3.2 is 8.0× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Grok 4.7 has the larger context window (500K vs 164K).
| DeepSeek V3.2 | Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.27 | $1.60 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.40 | $4.80 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.30 | $2.40 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.13 | $0.40 |
| Context window | 164K | 500K |
| Max output | 66K | 450K |
| Intelligence index | — | 46.4 |
| Coding index | 44.2 | — |
| Providers | — | 4 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-12-01 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | 2026-09-28 | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 or Grok 4.7?
DeepSeek V3.2 is 8.0× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
DeepSeek V3.2 vs Grok 4.7: which has a bigger context window?
DeepSeek V3.2: 163,840 tokens. Grok 4.7: 500,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V3.2 ≈ $738.00, Grok 4.7 ≈ $5,600.
More comparisons
DeepSeek V3.2 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeDeepSeek V3.2 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeDeepSeek V3.2 vs Command A+DeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-6 Luna ProDeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-6 LunaDeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-6 Sol ProDeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-6 SolDeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Opus 5.5DeepSeek V3.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedDeepSeek V3.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashDeepSeek V3.2 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashDeepSeek V3.2 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXDeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-6 AstraDeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-6 Astra ProDeepSeek V3.2 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Command A+Grok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 LunaGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 SolGrok 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5