R1 0528 vs Grok 4.7

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

D

R1 0528

DeepSeek
$0.50 / $2.15
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
X

Grok 4.7

xAI
$1.60 / $4.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
D
X
Verdict: R1 0528 is 2.6× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Grok 4.7 has the larger context window (500K vs 164K).
R1 0528Grok 4.7
Input price / 1M$0.50$1.60
Output price / 1M$2.15$4.80
Blended price (3:1)$0.91$2.40
Cached input / 1M$0.35$0.40
Context window164K500K
Max output33K450K
Intelligence index—46.4
Coding index——
Providers—4
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-05-282026-09-21
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, R1 0528 or Grok 4.7?

R1 0528 is 2.6× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

R1 0528 vs Grok 4.7: which has a bigger context window?

R1 0528: 163,840 tokens. Grok 4.7: 500,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: R1 0528 ≈ $2,075, Grok 4.7 ≈ $5,600.

More comparisons

R1 0528 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeR1 0528 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeR1 0528 vs Command A+R1 0528 vs GPT-6 Luna ProR1 0528 vs GPT-6 LunaR1 0528 vs GPT-6 Sol ProR1 0528 vs GPT-6 SolR1 0528 vs Claude Opus 5.5R1 0528 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedR1 0528 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashR1 0528 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashR1 0528 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXR1 0528 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashR1 0528 vs GPT-6 AstraR1 0528 vs GPT-6 Astra ProR1 0528 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Command A+Grok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 LunaGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 SolGrok 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5