DeepSeek V3 vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 2.0× cheaper than DeepSeek V3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 164K).
| DeepSeek V3 | Qwen3.8 Omni Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.32 | $0.15 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.89 | $0.47 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.46 | $0.23 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.016 |
| Context window | 164K | 1M |
| Max output | 16K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2024-12-26 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3 or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 2.0× cheaper than DeepSeek V3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
DeepSeek V3 vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: which has a bigger context window?
DeepSeek V3: 163,840 tokens. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V3 ≈ $1,085, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash ≈ $535.00.
More comparisons
DeepSeek V3 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeDeepSeek V3 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeDeepSeek V3 vs Command A+DeepSeek V3 vs GPT-6 Luna ProDeepSeek V3 vs GPT-6 LunaDeepSeek V3 vs GPT-6 Sol ProDeepSeek V3 vs GPT-6 SolDeepSeek V3 vs Claude Opus 5.5DeepSeek V3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedDeepSeek V3 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashDeepSeek V3 vs Grok 4.7DeepSeek V3 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXDeepSeek V3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek V3 vs GPT-6 AstraDeepSeek V3 vs GPT-6 Astra ProDeepSeek V3 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Command A+Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5