DeepSeek V3 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: DeepSeek V3 is 22% cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 164K).
| DeepSeek V3 | GLM 5.3 FlashX | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.32 | $0.37 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.89 | $1.25 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.46 | $0.59 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.09 |
| Context window | 164K | 1M |
| Max output | 16K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2024-12-26 | 2026-09-18 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3 or GLM 5.3 FlashX?
DeepSeek V3 is 22% cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
DeepSeek V3 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX: which has a bigger context window?
DeepSeek V3: 163,840 tokens. GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V3 ≈ $1,085, GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365.
More comparisons
DeepSeek V3 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeDeepSeek V3 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeDeepSeek V3 vs Command A+DeepSeek V3 vs GPT-6 Luna ProDeepSeek V3 vs GPT-6 LunaDeepSeek V3 vs GPT-6 Sol ProDeepSeek V3 vs GPT-6 SolDeepSeek V3 vs Claude Opus 5.5DeepSeek V3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedDeepSeek V3 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashDeepSeek V3 vs Grok 4.7DeepSeek V3 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashDeepSeek V3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek V3 vs GPT-6 AstraDeepSeek V3 vs GPT-6 Astra ProDeepSeek V3 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)GLM 5.3 FlashX vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Command A+GLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Claude Opus 5.5