DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Ling 3.0 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

D

DeepSeek V3 0324

DeepSeek
$0.25 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
I

Ling 3.0 Flash

inclusionAI
$0.021 / $0.063
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
D
I
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash is 13.9× cheaper than DeepSeek V3 0324 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash has the larger context window (262K vs 164K).
DeepSeek V3 0324Ling 3.0 Flash
Input price / 1M$0.25$0.021
Output price / 1M$1.00$0.063
Blended price (3:1)$0.44$0.0315
Cached input / 1M$0.0042
Context window164K262K
Max output147K33K
Intelligence index9.7
Coding index21.250.6
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-03-242026-07-23
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3 0324 or Ling 3.0 Flash?

Ling 3.0 Flash is 13.9× cheaper than DeepSeek V3 0324 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Ling 3.0 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V3 0324: 163,840 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V3 0324 ≈ $1,000, Ling 3.0 Flash ≈ $73.50.

More comparisons