Command R (08-2024) vs Grok 4.7
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Command R (08-2024) is 9.1× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Grok 4.7 has the larger context window (500K vs 128K).
| Command R (08-2024) | Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.15 | $1.60 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.60 | $4.80 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.26 | $2.40 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.40 |
| Context window | 128K | 500K |
| Max output | 4K | 450K |
| Intelligence index | — | 46.4 |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 4 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command R (08-2024) or Grok 4.7?
Command R (08-2024) is 9.1× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command R (08-2024) vs Grok 4.7: which has a bigger context window?
Command R (08-2024): 128,000 tokens. Grok 4.7: 500,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command R (08-2024) ≈ $600.00, Grok 4.7 ≈ $5,600.
More comparisons
Command R (08-2024) vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand R (08-2024) vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand R (08-2024) vs Command A+Command R (08-2024) vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand R (08-2024) vs GPT-6 LunaCommand R (08-2024) vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand R (08-2024) vs GPT-6 SolCommand R (08-2024) vs Claude Opus 5.5Command R (08-2024) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCommand R (08-2024) vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashCommand R (08-2024) vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashCommand R (08-2024) vs GLM 5.3 FlashXCommand R (08-2024) vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCommand R (08-2024) vs GPT-6 AstraCommand R (08-2024) vs GPT-6 Astra ProCommand R (08-2024) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Command A+Grok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 LunaGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 SolGrok 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5