Command R (08-2024) vs GLM 5.3 FlashX

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

C

Command R (08-2024)

Cohere
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Z

GLM 5.3 FlashX

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
C
Z
Verdict: Command R (08-2024) is 2.2× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 128K).
Command R (08-2024)GLM 5.3 FlashX
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.37
Output price / 1M$0.60$1.25
Blended price (3:1)$0.26$0.59
Cached input / 1M$0.09
Context window128K1M
Max output4K131K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2024-08-302026-09-18
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Command R (08-2024) or GLM 5.3 FlashX?

Command R (08-2024) is 2.2× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Command R (08-2024) vs GLM 5.3 FlashX: which has a bigger context window?

Command R (08-2024): 128,000 tokens. GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command R (08-2024) ≈ $600.00, GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365.

More comparisons